Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Ford EcoSport 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 and Ford EcoSport 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport 2016 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford EcoSport 2017 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2016, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport 2017 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford EcoSport 2017 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2016. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2017 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2017 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport 2016, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2016 has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport 2017 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2016. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`205 kg | 1`275 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 440 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford EcoSport 2016. Therefore, Ford EcoSport 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |