Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 30 NM less than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.0 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1305 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 66 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 67 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |