Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 8 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 46 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 422 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 2 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 816 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |