Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Volkswagen T-Cross 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Cross is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Cross, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen T-Cross. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Cross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Cross, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Cross. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.58 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen T-Cross, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1281 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Cross has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 145 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Cross. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Cross (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`775 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`249 kg | 1`255 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 526 kg | 535 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Volkswagen T-Cross has
| |