Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 13 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford EcoSport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1120 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 19 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |