Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Captur, but torque is 90 NM less than Renault Captur. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 3.9 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 21 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`762 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Renault Captur has
| |