Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 43 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Cactus engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford EcoSport is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 17 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 358 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1170 litres | |
Ford EcoSport has 2 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 68 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 600 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |