Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 43 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 334 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1194 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 16 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |