Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2009

 
Ford EcoSport
2012 - 2017
Ford Kuga
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP200 HP
Torque: 186 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds8.2 seconds
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 60 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 134 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.39.9
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford EcoSport consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway760 km on highway
Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.01 m4.44 m
Width: 1.77 m1.84 m
Height: 1.67 m1.68 m
Ford EcoSport is smaller.
Ford EcoSport is 43 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litresno data
Ford Kuga has more luggage space.
Ford EcoSport has 77 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`130
Safety:
Quality:
above average

below average
Ford EcoSport has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 220 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 2007000
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv