Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2012 engine produces 44 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford EcoSport 2017. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.06 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2012 is larger. Ford EcoSport 2012 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, 29 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport 2012 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport 2012 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |