Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Ford EcoSport 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford EcoSport
2017 -
Ford EcoSport
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 166 HP90 - 140 HP
Torque: 170 - 250 NM140 - 215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 14 seconds11.5 - 14.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 5.84.4 - 8.3
Ford EcoSport 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford EcoSport 2012. On average, Ford EcoSport 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2012.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 160 - 190 mm (6.3 - 7.5 inches)180 mm (7.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.24 m
Width: 1.77 m1.83 m
Height: 1.65 m1.66 m
Ford EcoSport 2017 is smaller.
Ford EcoSport 2017 is 15 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport 2012, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres333 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres1238 litres
Ford EcoSport 2017 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford EcoSport 2017 has 23 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2012. The Ford EcoSport 2012 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`751~ 1`732
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 14 80010 200
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Ford EcoSport has
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv