Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 140 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 215 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 14.1 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.3 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Ford EcoSport petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Ford EcoSport equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller. Ford EcoSport is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 77 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`732 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |