Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Ford EcoSport 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford EcoSport
2012 - 2017
Ford EcoSport
2017 - 2022
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 140 HP100 - 166 HP
Torque: 140 - 215 NM170 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 - 14.1 seconds10.7 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 8.34.1 - 5.9
Ford EcoSport 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford EcoSport 2017. On average, Ford EcoSport 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)160 - 190 mm (6.3 - 7.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.10 m
Width: 1.83 m1.77 m
Height: 1.66 m1.65 m
Ford EcoSport 2012 is larger.
Ford EcoSport 2012 is 15 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1238 litres1238 litres
Ford EcoSport 2012 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`732 kg~ 1`751 kg
Net weight:~ 1`353 kg~ 1`286 kg
Load capacity:~ 379 kg~ 465 kg
Ford EcoSport 2012 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Ford EcoSport 2017. Therefore, Ford EcoSport 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 680010 800
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • higher ground clearance
  • lower price
Ford EcoSport has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv