Ford EcoSport 2012 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford EcoSport
2012 - 2017
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.02.0 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 140 HP127 - 230 HP
Torque: 140 - 215 NM220 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 - 14.1 seconds8.8 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 8.37.2 - 11.5
Ford EcoSport petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, Ford EcoSport equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.64 m
Width: 1.83 m1.85 m
Height: 1.66 m1.72 m
Ford EcoSport is smaller.
Ford EcoSport is 40 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres930 litres
Ford EcoSport has 132 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 308 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`732~ 2`454
Safety:
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): 94004400
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv