Ford Cougar 2000 vs Jaguar X-Type 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 244 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Cougar is more dynamic to drive. Ford Cougar engine produces 11 HP more power than Jaguar X-Type, but torque is 10 NM less than Jaguar X-Type. Thanks to more power Ford Cougar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.7 | |
| Ford Cougar consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Cougar could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar X-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type 2004: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jaguar S-Type | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar X-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Ford Cougar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Cougar is smaller. Ford Cougar is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar X-Type, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Cougar is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1415 litres | |
| Ford Cougar has 15 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar X-Type. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar X-Type (by 485 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Jaguar X-Type has
| |