Ford Cougar 1998 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Cougar is available only with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Cougar is 14 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Cougar is 36 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Cougar has 159 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Ford Cougar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 739 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Cougar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |