Ford Cougar 1998 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford Cougar is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Alfa Romeo GTV is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.7 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 205 HP | 144 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 176 - 234 NM | 169 - 271 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | 6.7 - 9.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 8.9 - 11.7 | |
Ford Cougar petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo GTV. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
Ford Cougar is 42 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 155 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
930 litres | no data | |
Ford Cougar has more luggage capacity. Ford Cougar has 275 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Cougar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Ford Cougar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`799 | ~ 1`778 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Cougar has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |