Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford C-Max 2010

 
Ford C-Max
2014 -
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 100 HP125 HP
Torque: 170 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds11.4 seconds
Ford C-Max 2010 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford C-Max 2014 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max 2010, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.1
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1220 km on highway
760 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max 2014 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Fiesta, Ford Tourneo, Ford B-MaxInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford EcoSport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford C-Max 2014 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.38 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.63 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2014 and Ford C-Max 2010 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1684 litres1684 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2014 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max 2010, which means Ford C-Max 2014 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`900
Safety:
Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 92005400
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv