Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max 2014 is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max 2014 engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford C-Max 2010, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Ford C-Max 2010. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max 2010 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford C-Max 2014 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2010, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max 2014 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max 2014 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Focus | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Fiesta, Ford B-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford C-Max 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2014 and Ford C-Max 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2014 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |