Ford C-Max 2014 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 263 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |