Ford C-Max 2014 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 45 NM less than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Scenic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Scenic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 140 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford C-Max, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |