Ford C-Max 2014 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 29 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.80 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 17 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford C-Max is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1684 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 916 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Ford C-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`915 kg | 1`954 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`390 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 634 kg | |
| Ford C-Max load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Renault Kangoo. Therefore, Renault Kangoo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kangoo scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |