Ford C-Max 2014 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 3 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 55 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford C-Max is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 105 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |