Ford C-Max 2014 vs BMW 2 series 2018
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 185 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW 2 sērija 2018: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split equally between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 3 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 645 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1905 litres | |
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford C-Max has 213 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 2 series (by 221 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`280 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 7400 | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |