Ford C-Max 2014 vs BMW 2 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 1 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 55 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 2 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford C-Max could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 2 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of BMW 2 series 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 3 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1905 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford C-Max has 213 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. This could mean that the Ford C-Max uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 2 series (by 221 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |