Ford C-Max 2014 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1684 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 263 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`374 kg | 1`516 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 486 kg | 614 kg | |
| Ford C-Max load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |
