Ford C-Max 2015 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford C-Max) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volkswagen Touran), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 1 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, but torque is 145 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1212 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 151 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 777 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |