Ford C-Max 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford C-Max) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Ford Galaxy) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 62 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1212 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 154 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |