Ford C-Max 2015 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford C-Max) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 9 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger. Ford C-Max is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1212 litres | no data | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity. Ford C-Max has 44 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |