Ford C-Max 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 62 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 39 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 544 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 544 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1212 litres | 2000 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 788 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |