Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford S-Max. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 39 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 2000 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |