Ford C-Max 2014 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 75 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
| By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 166 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caddy can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Caddy version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Caddy 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.82 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 242 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`127 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |