Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max 2014 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford C-Max 2010, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford C-Max 2010. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max 2014 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max 2014 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2010, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max 2014 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max 2014 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2014 and Ford C-Max 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max 2014 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford C-Max 2010 scores higher in safety tests. The Ford C-Max 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |