Ford C-Max 2014 vs Ford S-Max 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford S-Max. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
Ford C-Max is smaller. Ford C-Max is 39 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 3 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 432 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1684 litres | 2000 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 316 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |