Ford C-Max 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 151 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford C-Max consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
Ford C-Max is 13 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 437 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1837 litres | |
Ford C-Max has 113 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 217 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`877 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |