Ford C-Max 2005 vs Volkswagen Touran 2003
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Ford C-Max engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
930 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.65 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 662 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1989 litres | |
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Ford C-Max has 202 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 369 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |