Ford C-Max 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 27 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
870 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
Ford C-Max is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1989 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |