Ford C-Max 2003 vs Ford Focus 2005
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Ford C-Max and Ford Focus have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
1220 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
Ford C-Max is smaller, but higher. Ford C-Max is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 482 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1525 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Focus. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Ford Focus has
| |