Ford C-Max 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max 2003 and Ford C-Max 2007 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max 2003 and Ford C-Max 2007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 4.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
| |