Ford C-Max 2003 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |