Ford C-Max 2003 vs Honda FR-V 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Honda FR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda FR-V, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Honda FR-V. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 5 cm longer than the Honda FR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 439 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1049 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda FR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`975 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |