Ford C-Max 2003 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 19 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Corolla Verso. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Focus | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Ford C-Max engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower. Ford C-Max is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1760 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Corolla Verso (by 140 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Ford C-Max can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`835 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |