Ford C-Max 2003 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 68 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Ford Focus | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Lexus IS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |