Ford C-Max 2003 vs Opel Combo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive. Ford C-Max engine produces 44 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.4 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford C-Max consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford C-Max is larger, but lower. Ford C-Max is 1 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Opel Combo has
| |