Ford C-Max 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000

 
Ford C-Max
2003 - 2007
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 109 HP90 HP
Torque: 240 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds14.5 seconds
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive.
Ford C-Max engine produces 19 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1300 km on highway
960 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Ford FocusInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.28 m
Width: 1.82 m1.75 m
Height: 1.60 m1.64 m
Ford C-Max is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford C-Max is 5 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.6/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv