Ford C-Max 2007 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Ford C-Max engine produces 24 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine Renault Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford C-Max is 9 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1837 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 113 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |