Ford C-Max 2007 vs Ford S-Max 2006

 
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP140 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds10.2 seconds
Ford C-Max engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford S-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1290 km on highway
850 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years9 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.77 m
Width: 1.82 m1.85 m
Height: 1.60 m1.66 m
Ford C-Max is smaller.
Ford C-Max is 44 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 6 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 550 litres854 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data854 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 550 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres2100 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 480 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9902`505
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

below average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 28004000
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford S-Max has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv