Ford C-Max 2007 vs Opel Antara 2007

 
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Opel Antara
2007 - 2011
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 109 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds10.3 seconds
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving.
Ford C-Max engine produces 41 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.97.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km9.0 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
960 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 310'000 km530'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Ford FocusInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.85 m
Height: 1.60 m1.70 m
Ford C-Max is smaller.
Ford C-Max is 25 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford C-Max is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres1420 litres
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford C-Max has 180 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 200 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 1.7 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9202`225
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Antara has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24004600
Rating in user reviews: 5.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Antara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv