Ford C-Max 2007 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Ford C-Max engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Despite less power, Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford C-Max consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford C-Max consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford C-Max is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 2239 litres | |
| Ford C-Max has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 619 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Caddy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford C-Max has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |