Ford C-Max 2007 vs Opel Combo 2004

 
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP70 HP
Torque: 215 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds17 seconds
Ford C-Max is more dynamic to drive.
Ford C-Max engine produces 20 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Ford C-Max reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford C-Max consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Ford C-Max over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
980 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.32 m
Width: 1.82 m1.69 m
Height: 1.60 m1.80 m
Ford C-Max is larger, but lower.
Ford C-Max is 1 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Ford C-Max is 20 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litresno data
Ford C-Max has more luggage capacity.
Ford C-Max has 95 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Ford C-Max is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Ford C-Max can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9201`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 28002400
Pros and Cons: Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Opel Combo has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv